Washington Capitals 2016-17 Season Review: Tom Wilson

Apr 13, 2017; Washington, DC, USA; Washington Capitals right wing Tom Wilson (43) celebrates while leaving the ice after scoring the game winning goal in overtime against the Toronto Maple Leafs in game one of the first round of the 2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs at Verizon Center. The Capitals won 3-2 in overtime. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports
Apr 13, 2017; Washington, DC, USA; Washington Capitals right wing Tom Wilson (43) celebrates while leaving the ice after scoring the game winning goal in overtime against the Toronto Maple Leafs in game one of the first round of the 2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs at Verizon Center. The Capitals won 3-2 in overtime. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit

Tom Wilson proved to the Washington Capitals and himself that he is a useful NHL forward during the 2016-17 season. 

Perhaps no Washington Capitals player has been more frustrating than Tom Wilson. It seems like he has all the potential in the world. From time to time, Wilson shows flashes of brilliance, suggesting he could be something more than just a bottom six forward.

However, usually shortly after he does that, he does something that makes you shake your head. Still, Wilson had a productive season for the Capitals in his own special way. This season, he proved he is a useful NHL forward. How useful Wilson can be is up for debate, however.

All stats, unless otherwise noted, are at even strength. Corsi and goals for numbers are adjusted. Stats courtesy of Hockey Analysis. Italics represent a career high.

2016-17 Stats

Boxcar

GoalsAssistsPointsPP points5v5 pointsPlus-minusPenalty MinutesBlocked ShotsHitsTOI per game
71219019+91334423912:56

Rates

5v5 Goals/605v5 assists/605v5 primary assists/605v5 points/605v5 iCorsi/60PP goals/60PP assists/60PP points/60
0.410.830.281.2410.22000

Possession

CorsiFor%Rel. CorsiFor60Rel. CorsiAgainst60Rel. CorsiFor%GoalsFor%Rel. GoalsFor60Rel. Goals Against60Rel. GoalsFor%
51.3-3.14-5.551.261.2-0.37-0.20-0.5

The Good

More from Stars and Sticks

Wilson tied his career high in goals and set his career high in even strength goals per 60 minutes. He emerged as an above average defensive forward, setting a career high in plus-minus and posting the highest relative CorsiFor percentage at even strength of his career. Wilson suppressed shot attempts against despite facing some impressive competition.

He also emerged as one of the team’s top penalty killers. Wilson ranked fourth among Capitals forwards in shorthanded time. He wasn’t outstanding, but it’s certainly a step forward. Wilson carved out a niche in his game by improving his defense. He also set a career low for penalty minutes and continued to draw penalties at an impressive rate. Wilson scored three goals in the postseason after having a combined two points through his first 28 playoff games.

The Bad

Wilson’s problem remains his inability to create offense. Granted, he is used in a primarily defensive role. But you’d like to see Wilson add a little more offensively. Especially when he shows those flashes of brilliance. Also, Wilson still needs to cut down on the penalty minutes. The decrease to under two penalty minutes per game is something he can hang his hat on. But Wilson needs to be even better.

You’d like to see a first round pick become more than just a really good defensive forward. Wilson has the potential to be more, but at what point does his upside simply become a waste of talent?

Future

Wilson has proven he’s an NHL caliber forward. That’s a fact. Teams like physical forwards who can suppress shot attempts and kill penalties. Considering people were questioning Wilson’s NHL future after last season, this season is a step in the correct direction. But he needs to keep on taking more steps forward in his development. It’s crazy to think Wilson is just 23 years old.

Next: NHL Mock Expansion Draft

Discussion

Is he ready for a larger role? What line should Wilson be on next season? Should they have exposed him over Jay Beagle in the expansion draft? Discuss these questions, and more, in the comments.